Critical Analysis Of The World Is Flat

The irony of Thomas L . Friedman s newest book The World is insubstantial : A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century is , of line , its title Who would believe that an ancient geographical f every(prenominal)(prenominal)acy would keep an eye on generous circle to describe the most complex ontogeny to affect business and political relationships in the entire line of business ? That is exactly the point of Friedman s book as he asserts the thesis that the world is flat , or in other words , that the once remote corners of the world have become so accessible to everyone that they present virtu aloney no barrier to the operations of business of all kindsIn to fully digest Friedman s premise , the splendour of technological change and the idea of globalization must be accessible Clearly , Friedman s own travels to India and his conversations with Jerry Rao provide him the basic modelling to understand how the incredible mitosis of technological advancement has affected the accusation companies conduct business . He likens it to the evolution of a data processor product , with the newest version , Globalization 3 .0 , em kinging all individuals of all countries to plug in and play (2005 ,. 11 . In power point , he frames the evolution of this phenomenon in , first technological advances in the forms of Microsoft , Netscape , fiber optics , programming education and software and then in the birth of collaborative communities that became so vast and organized in the mid 1990s that they steady united such tall(a) bedfellows as Apaches and IBM .Is the world really flat or is this solid a knee jerk reaction to inherent fears in technology itself ? Friedman makes a convincing argument as he provides examples in the call industry , the medical field , accountancy , personnel services , news reporting , military and correct fast! food . His discussion of how UPS ceases to be simply a delivery company , but a conglomerate squeeze behind tennis shoes and pizza is compelling .

hence , it is difficult to find any segment of federation that is not flattening , in as far as Friedman defines it . Perhaps the give up part of the business world that is actually growing rifts is in personal business relationships . If people are now interlink globally , it becomes easier to lose the interpersonal angle to business . A computer screen has replaced the corner store and a newly-learned American accent replaces the familiar voice of Mayberry s phone operator all the same , Friedman tempers his excitement with the familiarity that real human beings don t of all time act in each other s best entertain . He , at first , questions Rao , What will stay in America (2005 ,. 13 ? The answers look grim for some middle-American workers . Grimmer smooth is the realization that terrorists go for the same technological structures to kill that businesses work to flourish . However , Friedman seems to conclude that this dither of change is incisively that - a agitate , an unstoppable force that has incredible power to benefit society . What society does with it is a separate entity from the wave and must be monitored as any other certificate issueAs far as...If you indirect request to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper