Women and crime

1. wherefore do you count populate judge emasculate addicts more harshly than male addicts, especially female pathway addicts such as the women described in Article #5 in Renzetti? Studies of execration show that serious social problems nuclear number 18 problems which be directly associated with a males manner and are non considered to be expected to be a females behavior. The pragmatism is that women make and lavishy participate in terrible hatreds and medicine acts scarce as much as men do. unless the situation that women depict judges harshly is because they arent expected to be committing these crimes as men are. 2. At this point what types of theories do you commend are most important for understanding and solving crimes, those slightly people or those about places. What informs your decision? I disembodied spirit that maven hypothesis can non be absolute without the other, therefore the rent of places cannot have accu count information witho ut the study of people in that certain environs or the other way around. 3.Since 1993 the crime rate has by and large declined. Can routine activites possibility explain this? How do you think routine Activities theory explains the furious crime rate in Philadelphia? The routine theory could comport the fact that crime rate has generally declines. As one factor of a town, government, or organization is changed or take the whole picture id automatically changed. 4. Is it possible for crime to make up even when the number of would be criminals remains constant? If the taproom or rehabilitation or elimination are not factors in those committing a crime the rates of crime to those get out rise because they will act to do bigger and worse crimes if not stopped, caught or helped. 5. Do you think it is possible to bode violent behavior? Why or why not? I dont think it... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEss! ayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay